Re: CAR vs CBWFQ in relation to Policing and guaranteed B/W

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Tue Aug 10 2004 - 10:16:10 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie2be: "Re: spanning-tree portfast trunk"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "Re: spanning-tree portfast trunk"
• Maybe in reply to: David Duncon: "CAR vs CBWFQ in relation to Policing and guaranteed B/W"
• Next in thread: asadovnikov: "RE: CAR vs CBWFQ in relation to Policing and guaranteed B/W"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>>But then again unlike "bandwidth" command , "priority command" do have >>inbuilt policer ???

Yes, if your router interfaces is under congestion.

>>- Secondly on Option 1, but I am not sure whether CAR can do both policing >>and bandwidth allocation at the same time ?

I do not know. Trying to discover.

• Next message: ccie2be: "Re: spanning-tree portfast trunk"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "Re: spanning-tree portfast trunk"
• Maybe in reply to: David Duncon: "CAR vs CBWFQ in relation to Policing and guaranteed B/W"
• Next in thread: asadovnikov: "RE: CAR vs CBWFQ in relation to Policing and guaranteed B/W"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:36 GMT-3