From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Sun Aug 08 2004 - 00:04:54 GMT-3
Actually, I can't say I've found lots of mistakes on the Doc Cd. A few, yes.
Mostly, I find the Doc CD isn't very helpful if you don't already know
something extremely well.
For example, if you have a question regarding why a command should be used
or if there are pre-requisites that must be met before a command should used
or on which routers a command should be used, the Doc CD very rarely helps
clear things up.
Let's say, for example, you don't remember what command is needed for a
router to authenticate using pap. If you look in the command reference
under ppp, unfortunately, you won't find the command. It's not there.
Things like that, I imagine, can be a bit unsettling during the lab.
On the other hand, the Doc CD is exceptionally good for 3550 info. Go
figure.
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
To: "'phase90'" <phase90@comcast.net>; "'Richard Dumoulin'"
<richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>; "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 10:33 PM
Subject: RE: Doc - CD Mistakes
> Mistakes do happen, no doubt about it. But on the other hand, there's a
LOT
> of material, and LOTS of different people putting things together. You've
> seen some discussions around here at times where NOBODY can agree. :)
>
> The fact that you can assess errors in the Docs and find your way around
> them should indicate a good level of understanding on your part!
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
> JNCIP, et al.
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
> http://www.ipexpert.net
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> phase90
> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 9:45 PM
> To: Richard Dumoulin; ccie2be; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Doc - CD Mistakes
>
> Hopefully the ccie2be isn't in airport security or we're in big trouble.
>
> JVH
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Dumoulin" <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>
> To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 7:57 PM
> Subject: RE: Doc - CD Mistakes
>
>
> > Are you working for Cisco ? Hehe, just kidding.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
> > Sent: domingo, 08 de agosto de 2004 1:16
> > To: Richard Dumoulin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Doc - CD Mistakes
> >
> >
> > Hey Richard,
> >
> > If there weren't a whole slew of mistakes and misleading statements,
> > how could the lab be a challenge? You wouldn't want a lab that any
> > dummy
> could
> > pass, would you?
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Richard Dumoulin" <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 6:08 PM
> > Subject: BGP ORF
> >
> >
> > > Has anyone noticed that on the config guide the prefix-list is never
> > applied
> > > ?
> > >
> >
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122
> > > t/122t4/ftbgporf.htm
> > >
> > > So many errors on the only resource available in the exam !
> > >
> > > --Richard
> > >
> > >
> > > ********************************************************************
> > > ** Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual
> > > and not
> > necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it
> > are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
> > you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
> > delivering it to the intended recipient, be advised that you have
> > received this email in error and that any dissemination, distribution,
> > copying or use is strictly prohibited.
> > >
> > > If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned
> > > with the
> > content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
> > >
> > > The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
> > > viruses
> > which could damage your own computer system. While the sender has
> > taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot
> > accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of
> > software
> viruses.
> > You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any
> > attachments
> to
> > this e-mail.
> > > ********************************************************************
> > > **
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > __
> > > _
> > > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
from:
> > > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> > from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> > from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:34 GMT-3