From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Thu Aug 05 2004 - 00:30:22 GMT-3
If it's a route-reflector, you are obviously running iBGP. In iBGP there is
no spec for direct interface connection, so who cares...
If there's only one way to peer with the other router, it makes no
difference. If there's more than one way, perhaps the loopback gives you
redundancy.
You'll have to think through your scenario and all the details to really
come up with a good answer. But whichever one you pick, someone else will
pick differently.
;)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Edi
Guntoro
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 11:21 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP Peering
Hi groups
What is your opinion/ suggestion if r2 act as Router reflector, and let's
say they're have a direct connection r1-r2-r3.
Which one is better peering using direct interface or using their loopback
interface. Please your explanation..
:-)
Thanks
Edi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:33 GMT-3