From: Larry Metzger (larrymetzger@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Wed Aug 04 2004 - 02:41:10 GMT-3
The weight is not a preferred option, it is a balancing option. The
higher the number the more circuits it will take.
"The circuit-weight of a remote peer controls the number of circuits
that peer can take. If multiple, equally low-cost peers can reach a
remote source, the circuits to that remote source are distributed among
the remote peers based on the ratio of their configured circuit-weights.
The peer with the highest circuit-weight takes more circuits."
See this link.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft
/120t/120t3/loadbal.htm
or
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/
fibm_c/bcfpart2/bcfdlsw.htm#wp1003187
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
James Yeo
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:02 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW Circuit-weight ?
Hi Group,
Where can I find out which wieght is preferred in load balancing DLSW.
Doc cd
says [1-100] under circuit-weight so I assume the higher the value the
higher
the priority.
Kind regards
James
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:32 GMT-3