From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Tue Aug 03 2004 - 15:28:09 GMT-3
At 2:02 PM -0400 8/3/04, McNeace, Roger wrote:
>Did you notice the date on the RFC April 1st. They have one every
>year. My favorite is the Avian Carrier Protocol RFC 1149 and Avian
>QOS RFC 2549.
I know it was an April 1, but I was referring to a real order I got
from an editor.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:hcb@gettcomm.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 1:44 PM
>To: joedeleonardo@cox.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: RFC
>
>
>At 1:02 PM -0400 8/3/04, <joedeleonardo@cox.net> wrote:
>>This is kind of funny. I cant believe its for real.
>>
>>http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3092.txt
>>
>
>It's real enough that Cisco Press, and associated imprints such as
>Macmillan Technical Publishing, would not allow the use of "foo" in
>its books, at least a few years ago. I was told, by my editor, that
>someone in Cisco marketed decided it was a derivative of something
>obscene and was, therefore, banned.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:32 GMT-3