RE: Static routes

From: Mohamed (nmohamed@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Aug 03 2004 - 11:56:38 GMT-3

• Next message: Koen Peetermans: "RE: Multicast admin boundaries"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "Multicast admin boundaries"
• Maybe in reply to: marc van hoof: "Static routes"
• Next in thread: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: Static routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,
This default network command will not act as a static route to forward
ip data packets, but work in terminal servers,

Thanks
Mohamed.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
marc van hoof
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 7:48 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Static routes

Technicality.

Does the 'ip default-network x.x.x.x' command count as a static route ?

If you're told to make sure a device can access every other device
without using a static route, is this a valid option ?

Thanks,

-marc.

• Next message: Koen Peetermans: "RE: Multicast admin boundaries"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "Multicast admin boundaries"
• Maybe in reply to: marc van hoof: "Static routes"
• Next in thread: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: Static routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:31 GMT-3