From: Daniel Sheedy (dansheedy@gmx.net)
Date: Tue Aug 03 2004 - 11:37:20 GMT-3
Hi Jongsoo,
It would depend on the wording of the Frame/ATM part, as to whether you
would HAVE to do it or not.
The main reason I include it is for the tcl script that I run.
For example:
Say R1 has a frame relay connection to R2.
If my script is run from r3, which is behind R1, what will happen if I dont
map the ip to the dlci?
Most likely it will time out.
Then I ask myself, if it times out, will this cause me stress wondering why
im not getting a reply to all my pings?
I will then have to go to the Frame relay router, to make sure that nothing
is screwed up there.
In the end it makes for a cleaner test, and less stress.
Dan Sheedy
----- Original Message -----
From: <jongsoo.kim@intelsat.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 4:08 PM
Subject: some stupid question
> When I configure a multipoint interface using F/R PVC or ATM PVS/SVC on
test, is it necessary to map router's local interface ip address in addition
to the remore interface with DLCI or NSAP??? The only value I see by
mapping this is local interface is pingable. Most solution I've seen from
IPexpert always inlcudes this.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Jongsoo
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:31 GMT-3