Re: Redistribution - More is Less?

From: Phil (theccie@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jul 31 2004 - 01:30:10 GMT-3

Next message: Chuck South: "Re: Re: ISDN callback/dialer load-threshold."
Previous message: Phil: "Re: Frustrated"
Maybe in reply to: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Redistribution - More is Less?"
Next in thread: mani poopal: "Re: Redistribution - More is Less?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I ALWAYS use route-maps to filter redistribution, even when there is
one point only. They don't take points for extra configuration as long
as you are meeting the requirements.

Phil

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:23:47 -0400, gladston@br.ibm.com
<gladston@br.ibm.com> wrote:
> I am wondering if the Proctor would take away our points if we use route-map to filter redistribution when there is only one point of connection between two routing protocols.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Next message: Chuck South: "Re: Re: ISDN callback/dialer load-threshold."
Previous message: Phil: "Re: Frustrated"
Maybe in reply to: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Redistribution - More is Less?"
Next in thread: mani poopal: "Re: Redistribution - More is Less?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:07 GMT-3