Re: RE: Fragments

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Tue Jul 27 2004 - 17:04:47 GMT-3

• Next message: jongsoo.kim@intelsat.com: "Different behavior on BGP announcement between cisco and"
• Previous message: Baety Wayne A 30 SIG BN RS3 (cn): "RE: Fragments"
• Maybe in reply to: Baety Wayne A 30 SIG BN RS3 (cn): "RE: Fragments"
• Next in thread: Baety Wayne A 30 SIG BN RS3 (cn): "RE: RE: Fragments"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Would the IOS "remember" that the fragments belong to session http?

>>You could just permit the port 80 traffic before denying fragments...
>>Just a thought ;)

• Next message: jongsoo.kim@intelsat.com: "Different behavior on BGP announcement between cisco and"
• Previous message: Baety Wayne A 30 SIG BN RS3 (cn): "RE: Fragments"
• Maybe in reply to: Baety Wayne A 30 SIG BN RS3 (cn): "RE: Fragments"
• Next in thread: Baety Wayne A 30 SIG BN RS3 (cn): "RE: RE: Fragments"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:04 GMT-3