From: Kenneth Wygand (KWygand@customonline.com)
Date: Sun Jul 25 2004 - 21:22:31 GMT-3
Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
Thanks in advance!
Kenneth E. Wygand
Systems Engineer, Project Services
CISSP #37102, CCNP, CCDP, ACSP, Cisco IPT Design Specialist, MCP, CNA,
Network+, A+
Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.
"The only unattainable goal is the one not attempted."
-Anonymous
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Kenneth Wygand
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 11:17 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: More DLSW - Timeouts
Hey everyone,
I am working on a practice lab in which DLSW sessions should not
timeout. However the "timeout" attribute in the remote-peer command
only accepts values from 3 through 3600:
<snip>
R2(2503)(config)#dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1 timeout ?
<3-3600> Remote peer transmission timeout
</snip>
Is it possible that this requirement is looking for turning off
keepalives on each side locally? I don't think this would satisfy a
requirement for not "timing out" the connection though.
Thoughts?
Kenneth E. Wygand
Systems Engineer, Project Services
CISSP #37102, CCNP, CCDP, ACSP, Cisco IPT Design Specialist, MCP, CNA,
Network+, A+
Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.
"I am not really smart. I just stick with problems longer."
-Albert Einstein
Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.
"Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence"
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image001.gif]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:03 GMT-3