From: Joseph D. Phillips (josephdphillips@fastmail.us)
Date: Sun Jul 25 2004 - 16:31:12 GMT-3
Perfect. Thanks. :)
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:29:16 -0400, "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@cox.net> said:
> Joseph,
>
> It seems to me the use of the ToS bits as discussed by Solie is pretty
> antique. RFC 1349 was obsoleted by RFC 2474. You can match on ToS bits
> in
> the router IOS, but not on the Cat3550. I would bet 99.9% of L3 marking
> is
> done using Precedence or DSCP.
>
> Lab wording: "Use an obsolete method of Layer 3 marking that is
> inconsistent with latest IOS"
>
> Bob Sinclair
> CCIE #10427, CISSP, MCSE
> www.netmasterclass.net
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph D. Phillips" <josephdphillips@fastmail.us>
> To: "group study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 2:08 PM
> Subject: ToS bits
>
>
> > I'm reading more of CCIE PS2 and am having trouble distinguishing the
> > purposes of the ToS bits.
> >
> > What kind of exam wording would lead me to believe I'd have to set ToS
> > bits? In the real world, is it the best method to mark bits?
> >
> > I read you can only reference the ToS bits using either WFQ or WRED.
> > What about FRED?
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:03 GMT-3