From: Tim Fletcher (groupstudy@fletchmail.net)
Date: Sun Jul 25 2004 - 16:27:15 GMT-3
How about "sh run | section include router isis".
At 01:13 PM 7/25/2004, Joseph D. Phillips wrote:
>I noticed you used parentheses in:
>
> show run | inc (router ospf)|(summary)
>
>That outputs every line that matches each parenthetical phrase. Very
>cool.
>
>I was wondering how you would go about showing the running-config
>beginning with "router isis" such that you would exclude the references
>to "ip router isis" within interface configurations.
>
>I hope this makes sense.
>
>When I do show run | begin router isis I always see more than I want.
>
>
>
>On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 03:20:41 -0400, "Brian Dennis"
><bdennis@internetworkexpert.com> said:
>> They are referring to EIGRP, OSPF, BGP, etc summary/aggregate routes
>> that automatically point to null.
>>
>> Rack1R1#sho run | in (router ospf)|(summary)
>> router ospf 1
>> summary-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0
>> Rack1R1#sho ip rout | in Null
>> O 172.16.0.0/16 is a summary, 00:00:44, Null0
>> Rack1R1#
>>
>> Rack1R6#sho run | in (router bgp)|(aggregate)
>> router bgp 100
>> aggregate-address 96.0.0.0 224.0.0.0
>> Rack1R6#sho ip route | in Null
>> B 96.0.0.0/3 [200/0] via 0.0.0.0, 00:00:37, Null0
>> Rack1R6#
>>
>> Rack1R3#sho run | in (interface Serial1/0.34)|(summary-address)
>>
>> interface Serial1/0.34 point-to-point
>> ip summary-address eigrp 1 191.1.0.0 255.255.128.0 5
>> Rack1R3#sho ip route | in Null
>>
>> D 191.1.0.0/17 is a summary, 00:01:49, Null0
>> Rack1R3#
>>
>> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
>> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Howard C. Berkowitz
>> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 11:34 PM
>> To: group study
>> Subject: RE: Using ip route to null 0 to advertise local network to BGP
>> peer
>>
>> At 12:56 AM -0400 7/25/04, Brian Dennis wrote:
>> >Joseph,
>> > Here is a quote from the CCIE team's Networker's Presentation
>> >concerning the use of static routes:
>> >
>> ><quote>
>> >Unless a question says so, you are not permitted to use**:
>> >Static routes (of any kind)
>> >Default routes
>> >
>> >**Dynamic routes to null are permitted
>> ></quote>
>> >
>>
>> Brian,
>>
>> Would you agree that "dynamic route to null" pretty much has to be a
>> static route to null redistributed into a dynamic routing protocol?
>> Offhand, I don't think any dynamic routing protocol has any inherent
>> knowledge of null, so the information really has to come from a
>> static route.
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:02 GMT-3