Re: Administrativly scooped address

From: James (james@towardex.com)
Date: Fri Jul 23 2004 - 17:44:08 GMT-3

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: ISIS mutiple area question.."
Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Administrativly scooped address"
Maybe in reply to: alsontra@hotmail.com: "Administrativly scooped address"
Next in thread: alsontra@hotmail.com: "Re: Administrativly scooped address"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 03:32:57PM -0700, alsontra@hotmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Brain/All
>
> but..... I'm only interested in verifying 1918 addresses. Would the
> following be considered complete?

That is more than complete... RFC1918 is 10/8, 172.16/12, 192.168/16,
a.k.a "Addressing Space for Private Internets", etc...

If the wording of question specfiically states RFC1918, the acl you typed
below will probably fail the question..

-J

> > > ip access-list extended RFC1918
> > > deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
> > > deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any
> > > deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
> > > deny ip 224.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 any
> > > deny ip 240.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 any
> > > permit ip any any

-- 
James Jun                                            TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Technical Lead                        Network Design, Consulting, IT Outsourcing
james@towardex.com                  Boston-based Colocation & Bandwidth Services
cell: 1(978)-394-2867           web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: ISIS mutiple area question.."
Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Administrativly scooped address"
Maybe in reply to: alsontra@hotmail.com: "Administrativly scooped address"
Next in thread: alsontra@hotmail.com: "Re: Administrativly scooped address"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:01 GMT-3