From: Ty (tycampbell@comcast.net)
Date: Fri Jul 23 2004 - 07:05:35 GMT-3
Also, depending on the wording of the question, you may want to block
169.254.0.0 0.0.255.255
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergio Jimenez Arguedas" <sejimenez@its.co.cr>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 9:03 PM
Subject: RV: Administrativly scooped address
> Hi Alsontra,
>
> How about 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255?
>
> Rgds,
>
> Sergio
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]En nombre de
> alsontra@hotmail.com
> Enviado el: jueves, 22 de julio de 2004 21:42
> Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Asunto: Administrativly scooped address
>
>
> Group,
> If asked to block private ip and multicast ranges, would the
> following accomplish the task? I'm assuming there is an error in there
> somewhere. I've checked this several times, but apparently I'm somehow
> making
> mistakes?
>
> ADMIN SCOPE FOR IPV4-
>
> ip access-list extended RFC1918
> deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
> deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any
> deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
> deny ip 224.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 any
> deny ip 240.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 any
> permit ip any any
>
> ADMIN SCOPE FOR IPV4 MULTICAST
>
> ip access-list extended RFC2365
> deny ip 239.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
> permit ip any any
>
> Thanks,
> Alsontra
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:01 GMT-3