From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Thu Jul 22 2004 - 23:40:31 GMT-3
At 6:15 PM -0700 7/22/04, Joseph D. Phillips wrote:
>Ah, that's it.
Somehow, I hear, through the electronic page, the satisfied tones of
one who has just succeeded in getting a lovely person of the
appropriate gender to scratch EXACTLY where it itches. :-)
I'm glad I could help!
Seriously, the other real-world piece of these is being sure the
hosts know the default gateway(s) address. I'd tend to say that the
lab wouldn't test the router's ability to do this as a DHCP server
due to the lack of true hosts in the lab, but how perverse could they
get? If you start seeing SOHO routers on the equipment list, I'd
start getting worried about exercises in either DHCP or IPCP/PPPoE
proxied to DHCP.
>On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:58:21 -0400, "Howard C. Berkowitz"
><hcb@gettcomm.com> said:
>> At 7:53 PM -0400 7/22/04, James wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:32:11PM -0700,
>>josephdphillips@fastmail.us wrote:
>> >> I can't find those other protocols. Can someone help? They were
>> >>discussed a week
>> >> or so ago.
>> >
>> >VRRP?
>> >
>> >Also there is IRDP which is not exactly the similar thing, but
>> >another method of
>> >"find backup means of providing 'redundant' *gateway* service to
>>end nodes"..
>>
>> And GLBP.
>>
>> And in the real world, passive RIP (*NIX routed with the -q option),
>> with the router announcing default.
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:01 GMT-3