From: Sam Joseph (samjoseph747@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 20 2004 - 14:54:04 GMT-3
You are right. I can do a static route on R3 to make this all work. What
other options I have?.
Thx,
Sam.
>From: Kinney Robert-RKINNEY1 <Robert.Kinney@motorola.com>
>To: "'Sam Joseph'" <samjoseph747@hotmail.com>, groupstudy@american-hero.com
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Interesting Scenario From William ParkHusrt Chapter 11-3
>Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:15:47 -0500
>
>Sam,
>
>Did you add the "nei X database-filter all out" on R2 towards R3? If that's
>the case, I think that R3 does not have a route to R1's Ethernet address.
>So, R1 would have the route to R3's Lo0 but R3 would not know how to route
>back to R1.
>
>Rob K.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Sam
>Joseph
>Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:54 PM
>To: groupstudy@american-hero.com
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Interesting Scenario From William ParkHusrt Chapter 11-3
>
>
>Yes. R3's Lo0 was intsalled on R1's routing table.
>R3 does not have R1's or R2's Lo0 routes. When I do a Sh ip ospf nei
>detail,
>the lsa's are filtered.
>Trying to get R1 to Ping R3's Lo0 & Vice-Versa, spent quite sometime on it.
>No Luck So far.
>
>Thx,
>Sam.
>
>
>
> >From: "Larry Roberts" <groupstudy@american-hero.com>
> >Reply-To: <groupstudy@american-hero.com>
> >To: "'Sam Joseph'" <samjoseph747@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: Interesting Scenario From William ParkHusrt Chapter 11-3
> >Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:22:38 -0500
> >
> >When you say the route was visible, do you mean that R3's Lo was
> >visible on R1?
> >
> >Was the network between R1-R2 visible on R3 ?
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >Sam Joseph
> >Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 9:11 PM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Interesting Scenario From William ParkHusrt Chapter 11-3
> >
> >Dear Group,
> >
> >Was doing a reading Ospf Command Reference Guide by William Parkhurst.
> >On Chapter 11, it was talking about neighbhor database filtering.
> >Tested it on my home lab it worked o.k. with Parallel interfaces
> >between R2 and R3. However, when I did a little change, I could not
> >ping the Loop Back interface of R3. Here is how I connected three
> >routers.
> >
> >R1---- R2 ----- R3.
> >
> >Between R2 and R3 it is NBMA Network type with neighbhor command on
> >both routers. R1 E0,lo0 and R2 E0,lo0 are on BB area. R2 S0 and R3S0 is
> >frame-relay. R2 S0 and R3s0, lo0 are in area 100.
> >
> >Was able to ping o.K. all interfaces after the initial ospf config.
> >
> >But when I enter neighbhor xx.xx.xx.xx database-filter all out,could
> >not ping R3's Lo0 from R1 but the route is visible.
> >
> >Can someone shed light on this?.
> >
> >Thx,
> >
> >Sam.
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
> >FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> >http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
>http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:59 GMT-3