From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Jul 17 2004 - 18:06:15 GMT-3
Richard,
There are a number of different variables that affect the
behavior. There is a matrix at the below link which outlines the cases.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk352/technologies_tech_note09186a
0080093fdd.shtml
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Richard Dumoulin
> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 8:30 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RIP Secondary
>
> Has anyone noticed the following ? Suppose RouterA has interface
> ethernet0
> in a RIP domain. Interface ethernet0 has both a primary and a
secondary ip
> address. We want to advertise the secondary ip address out this
interface.
> Well, I could not make it work except if I configured the secondary on
> another interface ! I even disabled split-horizon but in vane !!
> Anyone has an idea ? I have two different IOS versions on my rack and
both
> behave the same,
>
> --Richard
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and
not
> necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it
are
> confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you
are
> not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it
to
> the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
in
> error and that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is
strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with
the
> content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
>
> The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
viruses
> which could damage your own computer system. While the sender has
taken
> every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept
> liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software
> viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any
> attachments to this e-mail.
> **********************************************************************
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:57 GMT-3