Re: INE Lab 20 Section 5.48 - 5.51 "FULL IP REACHABILITY"

From: Art Lee (bahia111@comcast.net)
Date: Tue Jul 13 2004 - 23:40:12 GMT-3

Next message: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: Max-reserved-bandwidth question"
Previous message: ccienj: "Re: Priority-queue over Frame-Relay"
Maybe in reply to: Joseph D. Phillips: "INE Lab 20 Section 5.48 - 5.51 "FULL IP REACHABILITY""
Next in thread: mani poopal: "Re: INE Lab 20 Section 5.48 - 5.51 "FULL IP REACHABILITY""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Never mind!!!!!!!!!!!...... This is a redistribution exercise & the
issue is level-2 routes being redistributed into level-1, since R6 &
BB1 are level-1 routes

-- 
***********************
Art Lee
bahia111@comcast.net
Digital Pixels

Next message: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: Max-reserved-bandwidth question"
Previous message: ccienj: "Re: Priority-queue over Frame-Relay"
Maybe in reply to: Joseph D. Phillips: "INE Lab 20 Section 5.48 - 5.51 "FULL IP REACHABILITY""
Next in thread: mani poopal: "Re: INE Lab 20 Section 5.48 - 5.51 "FULL IP REACHABILITY""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:54 GMT-3