From: Scott Savage (rolande23@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Tue Jul 13 2004 - 11:08:53 GMT-3
I was under the impression that bandwidth-percent was
a function of the bandwidth statement on the interface
and not the reserved bandwidth. Thanks for the
explanation!
--- Kenneth Wygand <KWygand@customonline.com> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> While either answer will technically work,
> "max-reserved-bandwidth 80" is the more correct
> answer. This merely sets and upper bound on the
> cumulative percentages of bandwidth you can
> "guarantee" (more appropriate than "reserve",
> because other classes can use the bandwidth
> "guaranteed" for another class when not being used).
> In older versions of code (12.1T and 12.2), the
> percentage you guaranteed through
> "bandwidth-percent", is actually a percent of the
> "max-reserved-bandwidth" as opposed to a percentage
> of the full link bandwidth. However, in 12.2T and
> 12.3, this has been changed to reflect the
> percentage of the full link bandwidth.
=====
-- Scott Savage
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:54 GMT-3