From: akbar khan (ciscokhan@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jul 10 2004 - 15:23:19 GMT-3
I have some concerns, on your second question i.e.
I guess if your asked to inject a default route in NSSA
then using defaul-information-originate will accomplish the task with
still having type 3 LSA's in the routing table
however if you use area 10 nssa no-summary then you will have only one
default route in your routing table with no type 3 LSA...
what do you say..?
Akbar khan
>From: <barrerj1@hotmail.com> >Reply-To: <barrerj1@hotmail.com> >To:
<ccielab@groupstudy.com> >Subject: OSPF questions >Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004
13:06:38 -0500 > >When doing OSPF what is the best approach for the
following statements? > >I like the first option best and both
accomplished the same solution, >but I'm not sure. > > > > > >Router ospf
10 > >Router-id 10.1.1.1 > >Network 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 > > > >Or >
> > >Router ospf 10 > >Router-id 10.1.1.1 > >Network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
area 0 > > > >Additionally, > > > > > > > >When the requirement in OSPF
dictates to include a default route in an >OSPF nssa area, with two
routers I have two choices: > > > >Area 10 nssa
default-information-originate > > > >Or > > > >Area 10 nssa no-summary >
> > > > >Can someone explain the difference? > > > >Thanks > >Jojo >
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com > >Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:51 GMT-3