From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Thu Jul 08 2004 - 15:15:11 GMT-3
Think distance man! :)
The problem with recursive routing (on a tunnel interface) is when the
router decides it wants to get to the other side of the tunnel
(tunnel-destination ip) through the tunnel itself. It brings about one of
those philosophical quandaries in life.
So think like the router does. Routing is just fine before the tunnel comes
up, learning through RIP, right? After the tunnel comes up, the router
learns the same route through OSPF. OSPF is preferred. Why? AD.
So... Recognize the problem, then alleviate it! Make the router do what
you want. :)
Change the distance for that route (either in OSPF or in RIP, depending on
your lab requirements) and life will be better. The same decision factor
for that route should bring the same result both before and after the tunnel
is created.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
tycampbell@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:56 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: recursive routing
I have searched the doc cd...over and over..even searched on google.
I am looking for a way to fix recursive routing through a tunnel without
using static routes..
anyone have any ideas ?
Thanks!!!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:50 GMT-3