From: MMoniz (ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jul 07 2004 - 22:27:20 GMT-3
Actually it will if you cross pins 1-2..3-6 to 1-2...4-5 !!!!! lol
At least the light may come on for a moment!!
Also I don't believe the 3550 supports ISIS.
Cat-3550(config)#router ?
bgp Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)
egp Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP)
eigrp Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP)
igrp Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP)
isis ISO IS-IS
iso-igrp IGRP for OSI networks
mobile Mobile routes
odr On Demand stub Routes
ospf Open Shortest Path First (OSPF)
rip Routing Information Protocol (RIP)
static Static routes
Cat-3550(config)#router isis
Cat-3550(config)#
At least on this code
c3550-i5k2l2q3-mz.121-14.EA1.bin
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Ken Diliberto
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:57 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Limitations of 3550emi
You mean even though the T1 plug fits in the Ethernet connector it won't
work??? :-)
The 3550 doesn't support certain policy routing features and traffic
shaping/policing features as well.
Cisco has documents for each IOS release on the 3550 that say what isn't
supported.
Ken
Kenneth Wygand wrote:
>?
>Not to mention the (sometimes not so) obvious fact that the 3550 EMI can
only handle ethernet interfaces... won't work for a T1 circuit... ;-)
>
>Ken
>
>________________________________
>
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of James
>Sent: Wed 7/7/2004 7:56 PM
>To: Tom Rogers
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Limitations of 3550emi
>
>
>
>On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:25:43PM -0700, Tom Rogers wrote:
>
>
>>Hi group,
>>Can some list me the limitations 3550emi in comparison to a router?
>>
>>
>
>3550 EMI has unupgradeable 64MB RAM. This is not enough to do full BGP
>routing with ISP's. It's good enough to participate in an IBGP + IGP with
>limited set of routes in a small end POP/ethernet colo environment though.
>
>It also cannot do a few minor stuff that adds a little bit of annoyance
such
>as lack of uRPF, even though it takes the command properly.
>
>The QoS/traffic rate limitation features are also restricted on 3550 if you
>want to compare with a full blown router.
>
>Further, Cisco has tradition of being slow or not following up to its pre
>marketing claims on modular Layer3 switches. Don't expect exciting new
features.
>
>It is worth noting that 3750 had been advertised with IPv6 capability since
>the beginning and still no IPv6? heh.
>
>-J
>
>
>
>>Thanks
>>Tom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:49 GMT-3