From: Kenneth Wygand (KWygand@customonline.com)
Date: Wed Jul 07 2004 - 16:16:34 GMT-3
?
In my opinion, RIPv1 should still be tested in the lab. RIPv1 has lots of intricacies in understanding the logic taking place inside the router which, to me, is ultimately what the CCIE is testing. Not only that, but many, many companies out there are still running RIPv1, either due to support on legacy equipment or just because there is no business need to upgrade. I see engineers all the time that have no idea how RIPv1 works, and they have one heck of a time getting an application to communicate with it because they simply don't understand the internal logic.
I'd much rather see IS-IS be dropped from the R&S and left for the Service Provider exam, while keeping RIPv1 in the R&S. I think it would force R&S CCIE's to have a much better understanding of the protocols that will help them in the real world within the scope of an enterprise, where I believe the focus is for the CCIE R&S.
Just my $0.02.
Ken
________________________________
From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Joseph D. Phillips
Sent: Wed 7/7/2004 3:02 PM
To: group study
Subject: RE: RIPv1 on the Lab
Quite welcome. I hated RIPv1 anyway.
----- Original message -----
From: jean.paul.baaklini@accenture.com
To: josephdphillips@fastmail.us, ccielab@groupstudy.com
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 18:26:34 +0200
Subject: RE: RIPv1 on the Lab
Thanks Joseph!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Joseph D. Phillips
Sent: 07 July 2004 17:05
To: group study
Subject: Re: RIPv1 on the Lab
RIPv1 is OFF the lab. Don't bother with it. The proctor has told me in
each of my three attempts that this is so.
----- Original message -----
From: "Peter van Oene" <pvo@usermail.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 08:14:05 -0400
Subject: Re: RIPv1 on the Lab
At 05:00 AM 7/7/2004, jean.paul.baaklini@accenture.com wrote:
>Hi Group,
>
>The CCIE lab exam blueprint shows that RIPv2 will be tested during the
>lab. It doesn't say anything about RIPv1. Does it mean that RIPv1 won't
>be tested?
If you plan to be a CCIE, I hope you can manage a rip setup ;-) I'd be
ready for it myself. You might actually see it in the real world as
well.
>Thanks
>
>Regards,
>JP
>
>
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
>received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
the
>original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com <http://shop.groupstudy.com/>
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:48 GMT-3