From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Jul 03 2004 - 01:36:10 GMT-3
Yes it does. Free support is provided for all of Internetwork Expert's
products at http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Wayne Lawson
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 9:43 PM
> To: John Matus
> Cc: lab
> Subject: Re: lab 8 task 6.3-6.5 bgp installed routes
>
> John -
>
> Doesn't IE have their own support forum for stuff like this?!?....
>
>
>
> John Matus writes:
>
> > question regarding how bgp is going to install the prefixes from the
bb
> > routers...
> >
> > bb1--------------------r6------------------r2--------------------r3
> > --
> > ---
> > ---
> > sw2
> >
> > R6,R2 AND SW1 are in one AS, and sw2 and r2 are route-reflector
clients.
> i
> > have also have r6 as 'next-hop-self for r2 and sw2 in order to reach
> bb1.
> > however only r2 has installed the prefixes in the routing table. sw
1
> has the
> > prefixes in the bgp table but they are not installed<???> is this
> because sw2
> > is choosing igp over bgp for the routing decisions (igp peer) where
as
> r2 is
> > an ebgp peer, passing the prefixes to r3 is a different AS? i just
want
> to
> > make sure that sw2 should NOT have the prefixes in the routing table
but
> have
> > them in the bgp table. is this correct???????
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > John D. Matus
> > MCSE, CCNP
> > 818.782.2061 office
> > 818.430.8372 mobile
> > jmatus@pacbell.net
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:46 GMT-3