From: samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Fri Jul 02 2004 - 13:31:27 GMT-3
Thanks Brian
So if I understand u well, idle time out needs to be set to ZERO at the
remote end ?
Thanks
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Brian McGahan
Sent: 02 July 2004 17:44
To: samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk; studygroup
Subject: RE: ISDN persistent
Sam,
Interesting traffic is only locally significant. I.e. just
because the idle timer of one side is constantly reset does not mean the
other side is.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 6:58 AM
> To: studygroup
> Subject: ISDN persistent
>
> Hi Group
>
> When using ISDN persistent and the requirement stipulates that the
line
> should never go down.
> Is it necessary to use idle-timeout 0 on remote router. Or would
> "persistent" command act as interesting traffic and keeps on resetting
> interesting traffic even at the other end.
>
> TIA
>
> Sam
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:45 GMT-3