From: Stephen Skinner (stephen_ski@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 01 2004 - 07:34:02 GMT-3
i think
you basically have three ways of doing this
1 a gre tunnell
2 a virtual link
3 multiple ospf proccesses and redisttribution
from my experience (2 failed labs)i think IF you were to see this type of
senario on the lab ....then ALL three would work ther way in somehow...
>From: "Jason Westlund" <jason.westlund@nmwco.com>
>Reply-To: "Jason Westlund" <jason.westlund@nmwco.com>
>To: "Shibu Nair" <shinair@cisco.com>
>CC: "Joseph D. Phillips" <josephdphillips@fastmail.us>,
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: OSPF discontiguous backbone area
>Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:34:00 -0700
>
>Are you sure that the use of GRE is not permitted? Adding another OSPF
>process seems unlikely to me.
>
>-Jason
>CCIE #13261
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Shibu Nair
>Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 4:50 PM
>To: Jason Westlund
>Cc: Joseph D. Phillips; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: OSPF discontiguous backbone area
>
>True.. But he is not allowed to use virtual link or GRE in this case...
>I am not sure any other method u can do it..
>
>May be any other tunnel mechanism can be used... Like L2tpv3...
>But its a layer 2 tunnel...
>Shibu
>At 04:26 PM 6/28/2004 -0700, Jason Westlund wrote:
> >Extending area 0 is not likely to be allowed if you were taking the
>lab.
> >There is a way to create a GRE without creating another IP address.
> >
> >-Jason
> >CCIE# 13261
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >Shibu Nair
> >Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 11:17 AM
> >To: Joseph D. Phillips
> >Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: OSPF discontiguous backbone area
> >
> >Do not think any other options other than GRE or virtual-links.
> >Are you allowed to create more loopabck interfaces with new ip
> >addresses. ?
> >If so extend the area 0 everywhere throughout the non Area routers so
> >that
> >avoiding the discontiguous backbone :)
> >Shibu
> >
> >At 10:58 AM 6/28/2004 -0700, Joseph D. Phillips wrote:
> > >Let's say you were given the task of connecting two discontiguous
> >backbone
> > >areas and weren't allowed to use the virtual-link command under the
> >router
> > >processes.
> > >
> > >Besides a GRE tunnel, what are your other options?
> > >
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
>from:
> > >http://shop.groupstudy.com
> > >
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> >http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:44 GMT-3