From: Matt (matt_ccie_2004@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Jun 30 2004 - 09:34:52 GMT-3
Although I am not saying that a reboot is not a good
thing to do if you have the time, I would like to add
that the proctors reboot all your routers before they
are graded anyway.
-matt
--- Geert Nijs <geert.nijs@simac.be> wrote:
> Reboot before lunch is the best thing.
> "Clear frame-relay inarp" will not work 100%,
> especially if the router has already learned dynamic
> mappings.
>
> Normally you disable inverse-arp BEFORE a "no shut"
> of the interface. Of course - if they really want to
> make it hard
> (and they do :-), then your interface is already up
> with inverse-arp. Then all dynamic bindings are
> already
> learned (see with: sh frame-relay map and sh
> frame-relay pvc). The best thing to do is :
> configure your mappings, disable inverse-arp and
> reboot the router, and go one with another
> router.......
> Afterwards, verify with "sh frame-relay map" that
> ONLY the necessary DLCIs are there. NO MORE.
>
> Regards,
> Geert
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Koen Peetermans
> Sent: woensdag 30 juni 2004 12:01
> To: 'Lord, Chris'; 'Group Study'
> Subject: RE: Unused DLCIs in the real lab
>
>
> How about a command
>
> "clear frame-relay inarp"
>
> Should help I think....
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Koen.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Lord, Chris
> Sent: woensdag 30 juni 2004 11:36
> To: Group Study
> Subject: Unused DLCIs in the real lab
>
> Quite often in the lab scenarios we are asked only
> to use the dlci's marked
> on the diagram, e.g. use no frame inverse-arp.
> However, the base config
> often has the interface ip addresses specified and
> frame encapsulation and
> no shutdown already defined so dynamic mapping has
> already kicked-in before
> you ever touch the rack. Once you have applied your
> final config is it best
> practice to reboot the routers to clear out all of
> the junk we don't want.
> Doing this might loose you valuable time. If we
> don't do it will we loose
> marks or run the risk of false connectivity if we we
> just leave the mappings
> there? Thoughts!
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris.
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
> The information contained in this email is
> confidential and is intended for
> the recipient only. If you have received it in
> error, please notify us
> immediately by reply email and then delete it from
> your system. Please do
> not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose
> its contents to any
> other person or store or copy this information in
> any medium. The views
> contained in this email are those of the author and
> not necessarily those of
> Lorien plc.
>
> Thank you for your co-operation.
>
**********************************************************************
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:53 GMT-3