From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@cox.net)
Date: Sat Jun 26 2004 - 20:45:52 GMT-3
Peng,
I see the same result when I test this on an interface.
The command shape average 8000
results in sustained tcp traffic flow of 8000 bps.
The command shape peak 8000
results in sustained tcp traffic flow of 16000 bps
Tested using TTCP application over frame-relay.
HTH,
Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CISSP, MCSE
www.netmasterclass.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 6:47 PM
Subject: shape peak ans shape average
> Hi,
>
> I can not figure out the differences between them.
>
> It is said:
>
> For example:
>
> shape average 512000
> shape peak 512000
>
> According my understanding, both 512000 is CIR. Then
> for shape peak, the rate could be:
>
> (bc+be)/bc *cir
>
> Default bc=be, then for shape peak, the rate could be:
>
> (bc+be)/bc * 512000=1024000
>
>
> Is it right?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:50 GMT-3