Re: VOIP num-exp - DOC CD.

From: Karim (karim_ccie@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 26 2004 - 12:28:07 GMT-3


Thanks, this what I was thinking about. So the DOC. CD is wrong and config.
has to be:
num-exp 2123 5556611
!
dial peer voice 1 pots
 destination pattern 5556611

Not:
num-exp 2123 5556611
!
dial peer voice 1 pots
 destination pattern 2123

Karim.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: James Marinas
  To: karim_ccie@hotmail.com ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
  Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 6:07 PM
  Subject: RE: VOIP num-exp - DOC CD.

  Sure looks wrong to me and I agree with you that it should be the other way
around

>From: "Karim" <karim_ccie@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Karim" <karim_ccie@hotmail.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: VOIP num-exp - DOC CD.
>Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:55:45 +0300
>
>Hi all,
>
>I am confused regarding the config. of the num-exp and translation rule
used
>with viop peers. I thought that while configuring both, the destination
>pattern will be the translated number. I found that for num-exp (in the DOC
>CD) that the number used as the destination is the dialed number. Is it
wrong
>example ???
>
>num-exp 2123 5556611
>dial peer voice 1 pots
> destination pattern 2123
>
>
>In this example, every time the device receives a call for extension 2123,
the
>dialed digits will be replaced with 555-6611 and the call will be forwarded
to
>that telephone.
>
>Thanks for any clarification,
>
>Karim.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:50 GMT-3