RE: dialer idle-timeout

From: Richard Dumoulin (richard.dumoulin@vanco.es)
Date: Thu Jun 24 2004 - 14:44:31 GMT-3


Except if ISIS is defined as interesting traffic on the receiving side !

--Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: TiuN Hong Leng [mailto:hongleng@ms73.hinet.net]
Sent: jueves, 24 de junio de 2004 17:09
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: dialer idle-timeout

Hi,

Here is the scenario:

        FR--------R1---------ISDN-----------R2

IS-IS is running on the network. Backup interface or dial watch is
configured on R1.

To prevent R2 initiate a call, R2's BRI is configured without "dialer-group"
command.

The question is: do I need "dialer idle-timeout 0" on R2?

I think we have to do it.

The reason why we have to put "dialer idle-timeout 0" on the R2's BRI is
that without interesting traffic specified (no dialer-group on it), during
ISDN active it will disconnect every 120 seconds even though IS-IS is
configured on the other side.

Am I right?

Thanks in advance



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:49 GMT-3