RE: Routing without routing protocol

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 15:21:38 GMT-3


What about "default-gateway"???

At that point, you'll need to disable ip routing, but does that fall within
the confines of what you are or are not allowed to do?

Things don't always have a big convoluted fancy solution! Particularly if
the notation in your lab for 3550 reachability is someplace in the early
LAN/Catalyst section... Labs are fairly logically written in that regard
(for the most part).

So while NAT/PAT, or some other interesting solution may work (you still
need to get to the router before NAT takes place), think of the simple
things.

Just my opinion...

 
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:33 AM
To: Jolly, Sean; 'Kenneth Wygand'; Group Study
Subject: Re: Routing without routing protocol

Sorry, no cigar. That, along with additional static routes, default routes,
default networks are not allowed.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jolly, Sean" <sjolly@scrippsops.com>
To: "'Kenneth Wygand'" <KWygand@customonline.com>; "ccie2be"
<ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol

> PBR.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Wygand [mailto:KWygand@customonline.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:40 AM
> To: ccie2be; Group Study
> Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol
>
> Tim,
>
> How about providing a static route on R5 pointing to the Loopback
> interface on the 3550. Then NAT all traffic on R5 destined for the
> 3550's Loopback interface through E0/1 to the IP address on its E0/1
> interface, which the 3550 will see as directly connected.
>
> If you need your 3550 to be able to initiate pings to other addresses
> and you are not allowed a static default, you can do that by disabling
> IP routing and providing a default gateway to R5's E0/1 (provided the
> rules allow this).
>
> Kenneth E. Wygand
> Systems Engineer, Project Services
> CISSP #37102, CCNP, CCDP, ACSP, Cisco IPT Design Specialist, MCP, CNA,
> Network+, A+
> Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.
> "The only unattainable goal is the one not attempted."
> -Anonymous
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> ccie2be
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:10 AM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: Routing without routing protocol
>
> Hi All,
>
> This one got me.
>
> 3550 has routing enabled but no routing protocols enabled.
>
> It's only path to the rest of the network is via R5. All other routers
> on the
> other side of R5 must be able to ping the 3550's loopback.
>
> I'm allowed to use one static route on R5.
>
> This is what it looks like:
>
> 3550 lo0 fa0/5 ------- e0/1 R5 ----- rest of network
>
> How do I provide reachabiltiy to the 3550's lo0 without violating lab
> rules ie
> no default routes or default networks and
> no static routes except the one explicitly allowed here?
>
> Please tell me what I'm missing. Thanks, Tim
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:47 GMT-3