From: diptish doshi (diptishdoshi007@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 14:59:45 GMT-3
hi ,
Won't configuring ODR on R5 work ?
or im missing something.
regards,
diptish
--- "Alexander Arsenyev (GU/ETL)"
<alexander.arsenyev@ericsson.com> wrote:
> PBR is prohibited on R5 only or on both R5 and
> Cat3550?
> Cheers
> Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
> Sent: 22 June 2004 18:21
> To: Alexander Arsenyev (GU/ETL); 'Group Study'
> Subject: Re: Routing without routing protocol
>
>
> PBR, default network, static routes etc. were
> explicitly prohibited for this
> task.
>
> From the posts I've seen so far, it looks like NAT
> can be used and possibly
> irdp, but I'm not sure irdp would work.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alexander Arsenyev (GU/ETL)"
> <alexander.arsenyev@ericsson.com>
> To: "'Group Study'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 1:06 PM
> Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol
>
>
> > I believe PBR on Cat3550 also suits the
> requirement, never tried it myself
> though.
> > It is supported from IOS 12.1(13)EA1 , see
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/12113ea1/ol366401.htm#89520
> > Given that Cisco introduces new features into R&S
> lab 6 months after
> general release (see
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/rs/lab_exam_blueprint.html
> ) You
> are very likely to see Cat3550 with IOS supporting
> PBR in actual lab.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Cheers
> > Alex
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > ccie2be
> > Sent: 22 June 2004 17:45
> > To: Larry; 'MMoniz'; 'Group Study'
> > Subject: Re: Routing without routing protocol
> >
> >
> > Yeah, ip routing on the Cat was a required
> condition of the task. Based
> on
> > the other posts, I feel safe in saying that what
> they were looking for was
> > Nat, but I'm still open to the posibility that
> irdp could meet the
> > requirements, although I'm not yet 100% convinced.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Larry" <groupstudy@american-hero.com>
> > To: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "'MMoniz'"
> <ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com>;
> > "'Group Study'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 12:39 PM
> > Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol
> >
> >
> > > From my experience you will need to disable ip
> routing on the 3550, and
> > just
> > > enable irdp under the ethernet interface.
> > >
> > > The question is are you allowed to disable
> routing on the 3550? I know
> you
> > > said it was enabled, but does it have to stay
> enabled?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > ccie2be
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:00 AM
> > > To: MMoniz; Group Study
> > > Subject: Re: Routing without routing protocol
> > >
> > > OK, Mike. Maybe you're on to something, but...
> > >
> > > there's only basically one command, ip irdp.
> > >
> > > Using that one command, how do I make R5
> generate irdp messages as
> opposed
> > > to just listening for those messages. And,
> likewise with the 3550, how
> do
> > I
> > > make the 3550 listen for irdp instead of sending
> them?
> > >
> > > Thanks, Tim
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "MMoniz" <ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com>
> > > To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group
> Study"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:32 AM
> > > Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol
> > >
> > >
> > > > Actually you would need to enable IRDP on R5
> so it will produce IRDP
> > > > messages. The Cat will listen to these
> > > > as it will be the client.
> > > >
> > > > IRDP has the capability to "intercept" rip and
> igrp messages but this
> is
> > > not
> > > > a requirement.
> > > >
> > > > IRDP actually uses ICMP for messaging as the
> name implies. Here is a
> > link
> > > > for it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr
> > > > _c/ipcprt1/1cfipadr.htm#1001945
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:17 AM
> > > > To: MMoniz; Group Study
> > > > Subject: Re: Routing without routing protocol
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hey Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Option isn't allowed - the instructions
> explicitly told me to enable
> ip
> > > > routing on the 3550.
> > > >
> > > > Re: irdp. I thought of that this morning but I
> thought if irdp were
> > used,
> > > it
> > > > would have to be on the 3550. However, since
> there's no routing
> > protocol
> > > > running on the link between the 3550 and R5,
> there wouldn't be any
> > routing
> > > > updates to listen for.
> > > >
> > > > Also, if I remember correctly, irdp only
> listens for rip or igrp
> updates
> > > and
> > > > only ospf is running on R5.
> > > >
> > > > I think there's still something else I'm
> missing.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, I'm sure I'll find out, Tim
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "MMoniz" <ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com>
> > > > To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group
> Study"
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:28 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Well I would say you have basically 2
> options here.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Use IRDP on R5
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. Disable IP routing on the Cat and
> configure a default-gateway.
> This
> > > is
> > > > > not a static route or a static network!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:47 GMT-3