Re: Routing without routing protocol

From: Ken Diliberto (ken@kdmd.net)
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 14:40:47 GMT-3


CCIE2BE,

Are you not allowed to run a routing protocol?

Ken

ccie2be wrote:

>Hey Mike,
>
>Option isn't allowed - the instructions explicitly told me to enable ip
>routing on the 3550.
>
>Re: irdp. I thought of that this morning but I thought if irdp were used, it
>would have to be on the 3550. However, since there's no routing protocol
>running on the link between the 3550 and R5, there wouldn't be any routing
>updates to listen for.
>
>Also, if I remember correctly, irdp only listens for rip or igrp updates and
>only ospf is running on R5.
>
>I think there's still something else I'm missing.
>
>Thanks, I'm sure I'll find out, Tim
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "MMoniz" <ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com>
>To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:28 AM
>Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol
>
>
>
>
>>Well I would say you have basically 2 options here.
>>
>>1. Use IRDP on R5
>>
>>2. Disable IP routing on the Cat and configure a default-gateway. This is
>>not a static route or a static network!!
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>>ccie2be
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:10 AM
>>To: Group Study
>>Subject: Routing without routing protocol
>>
>>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>This one got me.
>>
>>3550 has routing enabled but no routing protocols enabled.
>>
>>It's only path to the rest of the network is via R5. All other routers on
>>the
>>other side of R5 must be able to ping the 3550's loopback.
>>
>>I'm allowed to use one static route on R5.
>>
>>This is what it looks like:
>>
>>3550 lo0 fa0/5 ------- e0/1 R5 ----- rest of network
>>
>>How do I provide reachabiltiy to the 3550's lo0 without violating lab
>>
>>
>rules
>
>
>>ie
>>no default routes or default networks and
>>no static routes except the one explicitly allowed here?
>>
>>Please tell me what I'm missing. Thanks, Tim



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:47 GMT-3