From: Alexander Arsenyev (GU/ETL) (alexander.arsenyev@ericsson.com)
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 14:06:33 GMT-3
I believe PBR on Cat3550 also suits the requirement, never tried it myself though.
It is supported from IOS 12.1(13)EA1 , see http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/12113ea1/ol366401.htm#89520
Given that Cisco introduces new features into R&S lab 6 months after general release (see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/rs/lab_exam_blueprint.html ) You are very likely to see Cat3550 with IOS supporting PBR in actual lab.
HTH,
Cheers
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: 22 June 2004 17:45
To: Larry; 'MMoniz'; 'Group Study'
Subject: Re: Routing without routing protocol
Yeah, ip routing on the Cat was a required condition of the task. Based on
the other posts, I feel safe in saying that what they were looking for was
Nat, but I'm still open to the posibility that irdp could meet the
requirements, although I'm not yet 100% convinced.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry" <groupstudy@american-hero.com>
To: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "'MMoniz'" <ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com>;
"'Group Study'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 12:39 PM
Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol
> From my experience you will need to disable ip routing on the 3550, and
just
> enable irdp under the ethernet interface.
>
> The question is are you allowed to disable routing on the 3550? I know you
> said it was enabled, but does it have to stay enabled?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> ccie2be
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:00 AM
> To: MMoniz; Group Study
> Subject: Re: Routing without routing protocol
>
> OK, Mike. Maybe you're on to something, but...
>
> there's only basically one command, ip irdp.
>
> Using that one command, how do I make R5 generate irdp messages as opposed
> to just listening for those messages. And, likewise with the 3550, how do
I
> make the 3550 listen for irdp instead of sending them?
>
> Thanks, Tim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "MMoniz" <ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com>
> To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:32 AM
> Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol
>
>
> > Actually you would need to enable IRDP on R5 so it will produce IRDP
> > messages. The Cat will listen to these
> > as it will be the client.
> >
> > IRDP has the capability to "intercept" rip and igrp messages but this is
> not
> > a requirement.
> >
> > IRDP actually uses ICMP for messaging as the name implies. Here is a
link
> > for it.
> >
> >
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr
> > _c/ipcprt1/1cfipadr.htm#1001945
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:17 AM
> > To: MMoniz; Group Study
> > Subject: Re: Routing without routing protocol
> >
> >
> > Hey Mike,
> >
> > Option isn't allowed - the instructions explicitly told me to enable ip
> > routing on the 3550.
> >
> > Re: irdp. I thought of that this morning but I thought if irdp were
used,
> it
> > would have to be on the 3550. However, since there's no routing
protocol
> > running on the link between the 3550 and R5, there wouldn't be any
routing
> > updates to listen for.
> >
> > Also, if I remember correctly, irdp only listens for rip or igrp updates
> and
> > only ospf is running on R5.
> >
> > I think there's still something else I'm missing.
> >
> > Thanks, I'm sure I'll find out, Tim
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "MMoniz" <ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com>
> > To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group Study"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:28 AM
> > Subject: RE: Routing without routing protocol
> >
> >
> > > Well I would say you have basically 2 options here.
> > >
> > > 1. Use IRDP on R5
> > >
> > > 2. Disable IP routing on the Cat and configure a default-gateway. This
> is
> > > not a static route or a static network!!
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > ccie2be
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:10 AM
> > > To: Group Study
> > > Subject: Routing without routing protocol
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > This one got me.
> > >
> > > 3550 has routing enabled but no routing protocols enabled.
> > >
> > > It's only path to the rest of the network is via R5. All other
routers
> on
> > > the
> > > other side of R5 must be able to ping the 3550's loopback.
> > >
> > > I'm allowed to use one static route on R5.
> > >
> > > This is what it looks like:
> > >
> > > 3550 lo0 fa0/5 ------- e0/1 R5 ----- rest of network
> > >
> > > How do I provide reachabiltiy to the 3550's lo0 without violating lab
> > rules
> > > ie
> > > no default routes or default networks and
> > > no static routes except the one explicitly allowed here?
> > >
> > > Please tell me what I'm missing. Thanks, Tim
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:47 GMT-3