From: Phil (theccie@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:26:11 GMT-3
Lucky him the country doesn't run on ISIS. :-)
Phil
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:37:54 -0400, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>
> Fortunately, not a runt either. :) (Or a martian depending on the involved
> encapsulation)
>
> Hmmm... I think that Cheney would enlist haliburton to rewrite the RFC so
> that the BDR had a pre-empt capability during perceived times of failure.
>
> I'm not entirely sure whether that would improve the stability or not!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Howard C. Berkowitz
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 12:12 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; security@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: RE: Congratulations Scott Morris (Is this a technical discus
> ssion???)
>
> At 11:50 AM -0400 6/21/04, Scott Morris wrote:
> >Aren't we supposed to avoid intense political or philosophical
> >discussions on this list??? :)
>
> I predict your child processed has been dampened, or will be soon, and will
> require re-encapsulation. Diapers are a tunneling protocol for baby
> payloads (as opposed to 802.3 baby giants, unless it's a very big child
> process)
>
> >
> >The lab may ask you to do something dumb. But if it's the dumb thing
> >they want, then you do it!
> >
> >Just because 20 million people believe in a dumb idea, it's still a dumb
> >idea... :)
>
> Obviously demonstrated by a significant number of those who do get elected.
> Alternatively, a number of incumbents demonstrate the lab concept that when
> you are faced with two evils, not doing things by best practice or doing
> things the Cisco way, the lesser of the two evils, in context, is the Cisco
> thing. In your professional life, continue to remember context.
>
> DR election is so much clearer than Presidential election. I wonder how Dick
> Cheney would feel if he were told he was a BDR?
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >Howard C. Berkowitz
> >Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 11:14 AM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; security@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: RE: Congratulations Scott Morris (Is this a technical
> >discus
> >ssion???)
> >
> >At 10:10 AM -0500 6/21/04, Jason Graun wrote:
> >>Ahmad, you and Howard are correct to wrongs don't make a right, I did
> >>get too belligerent and was not thinking when I wrote the e-mail. I
> >>would like to apologize.
> >>
> >>Jason
> >>
> >
> >Perhaps to calm things a bit, and be vaguely on topic, two wrong
> >protocol configurations, in the context of best real-world practices,
> >often are exactly the answer expected on the CCIE lab.
> >
> >:-)
> >
> >There is a mantra or koan here: "Do these two wrongs make a Cisco right?"
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> >http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:46 GMT-3