From: Tom Rogers (cccie71@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:42:51 GMT-3
They might restrict redistribution into the BackBone, so in that case should we consider NAT? Or forget about the reachability to the BackBones ????
This thing bother me too :-(
Tom
MMoniz <ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Hi Debbie, good question. It is one that really bothered me in some of my
attempts. My suggestion
would be is only do exactly what is asked!!! Don't spend alot of time trying
to get stuff to
work like you would in the real world if it wasn't asked of you. This could
waste valuable
time.
To me this was one the hardest things to overcome to passing the lab. I
always assumed that since
it was an R & S lab everything should work like in the real world. Not
always the case!!!
Of course if you have any doubts absolutely ask the proctor.
Mike Moniz
CCIE #13347
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Debbie Westall
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 8:15 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Lab and Backbone Router Reachability
In the real lab, if it doesnt specifically state "backbone routers should
have reachability to all routers", is it safe to assume that you should do
whatever it takes to get the reachability from the backbone routers to the
rest of your network? For example, redistributing connected or an IGP that
peers with the backbone routers?
In the labs I have been working it never states, full reachability. And I
have been wondering?
Thanks Much
Debbie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:44 GMT-3