From: RAdjakou/CFAO (radjakou@cfao.sn)
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 15:18:09 GMT-3
OyemLS have no adjacency with RP
"show ip ospf database external" on BitamRTC.
BITAM-RTC1#sh ip ospf dat external
OSPF Router with ID (217.77.69.129) (Process ID 1)
Type-5 AS External Link States
LS age: 229
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
LS Type: AS External Link
Link State ID: 217.77.69.128 (External Network Number )
Advertising Router: 217.77.69.129
LS Seq Number: 80000012
Checksum: 0x9A59
Length: 36
Network Mask: /26
Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
TOS: 0
Metric: 20
Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
External Route Tag: 0
LS age: 797
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
LS Type: AS External Link
Link State ID: 217.77.69.131 (External Network Number )
Advertising Router: 217.77.69.129
LS Seq Number: 80000001
Checksum: 0x1AA8
Length: 36
Network Mask: /32
Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
TOS: 0
Metric: 20
Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
External Route Tag: 0
----- Original Message -----
From: "RAdjakou/CFAO" <radjakou@cfao.sn>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:57 AM
Subject: OSPF Trouble
> Having this scheme
>
> RP---(area0)--------RtrOyem--(area9)---OyemRTC
> |
> |
>
> |-(area9)---OyemLS--(area9)---BitamLS--(area9)--BitamRTC
>
> loopback on routers RtrOyem, OyemRTC, Oyem LS, BitamLS and Bitam RTC
are
> all in area 9.
> On OyemRTC and BitamRTC, we redistribute into ospf addresses reserved
> for remote access users.
> Pb: RP has the route to addresses redistributed on OyemRTC, but not
for
> those redistributed on BitamRTC.
> All these addresses are seen as O N2 on ABR RtrOyem.
>
> Cordialement/Best regards;
> -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
> Roberto Adjakou
> E-mail : RAdjakou@cfao.sn
> -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:41 GMT-3