Re: When Mac conversion is required?

From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 19:58:48 GMT-3

Next message: Tony Schaffran: "RE: PPP over ATM"
Previous message: Art Lee: "Just A Test"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew B. Caslow: "When Mac conversion is required?"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: When Mac conversion is required?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

You want canonical? Can you handle canonical?

The Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legal Texts is the
department, in the Vatican, for the definitive interpretation of
Canon Law. If they run SNA through DLSW, will the application layer
be canonical or noncanonical?

Next message: Tony Schaffran: "RE: PPP over ATM"
Previous message: Art Lee: "Just A Test"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew B. Caslow: "When Mac conversion is required?"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: When Mac conversion is required?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:41 GMT-3