Re: Cat QoS Question

From: Cristian Henry H (chenry@reuna.cl)
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 11:55:17 GMT-3

Thanks a lot.

But, Does both configs change the dscp tag in the incoming packet?, I'm
not sure if the mutation-map does it, could be only to adjust it to an
internal qos scheme in order to get compatibility. Does it make sence?

Bob Sinclair ha escrito:
>
> Christian,
>
> I tried both in the lab. The dscp-mutation map approach worked fine just as
> you wrote it, and I prefer it for its simplicity. The policy-map setting
> dscp directly did not work as written. It does work with the trust
> statement in a separate, class-default stanza. Traffic entering as 45 goes
> out as 35, and other dscps go through unchanged.
>
> policy-map 45to35
> class 45to35
> set ip dscp 35
> class class-default
> trust dscp
>
> HTH,
>
> Bob Sinclair
> CCIE #10427, CISSP, MCSE
> www.netmasterclass.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cristian Henry H" <chenry@reuna.cl>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 7:30 PM
> Subject: Cat QoS Question
>
> > Hi friends,
> >
> > If you want to change the DSCP tag for incoming packest from 45 to 35 on
> > the Cat3550 swicth port F0/10, What the following configurations is the
> > correct one?, or Are both corrects?
> >
> > 1)
> >
> > mls qos
> > mls qos map dscp-mutation MUT1 45 to 35
> > !
> > int f0/10
> > mls qos truct dscp
> > mls qos dscp-mutation MUT1
> > !
> >
> > 2)
> >
> > mls qos
> > !
> > class-map 45to35
> > match ip dscp 45
> > !
> > policy-map 45to35
> > class 45to35
> > trust dscp
> > set ip dscp 35
> > !
> > !
> > int f0/10
> > service-policy input 45to35
> > !
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > --
> > Cristian E. Henry
> > REUNA
> >
> > E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
> > Fono: 56-2-3370336
> > 

-- 
Cristian E. Henry
REUNA

E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
Fono: 56-2-3370336

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:41 GMT-3