From: C.Sammarcellino@sirtisistemi.it
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 10:23:43 GMT-3
I belave there is a exception and is the command :
DLSW Trasparent Map
where the MAC is in canonical form
Bye
Ciro
"Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>@groupstudy.com on 15/06/2004 12.30.52
Please respond to "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: "'Tom Rogers'" <cccie71@yahoo.com>, "'Peng Zheng'"
<zpnist@yahoo.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: When Mac conversion is required?
EVERYTHING inside DLSW is non-canonical. So even though you are going from
ethernet to ethernet (canonical on both ends) the stuff in the middle is
non-canonical still.
So ANY DLSW commands or filters should be in non-canonical format.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Tom
Rogers
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 2:00 AM
To: Peng Zheng; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: When Mac conversion is required?
I would convert in both if the resource is on Ethernet.
Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com> wrote:Hi,
For dlsw config with only Ethernet, when should I convert the cannonical to
non-cannonical address?
Do I need to convert in
dlsw icanreach max-address
and
dmac-output-list?
Thanks.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
o!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:40 GMT-3