RE: When Mac conversion is required?

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 08:30:52 GMT-3


EVERYTHING inside DLSW is non-canonical. So even though you are going from
ethernet to ethernet (canonical on both ends) the stuff in the middle is
non-canonical still.

So ANY DLSW commands or filters should be in non-canonical format.

 
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Tom
Rogers
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 2:00 AM
To: Peng Zheng; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: When Mac conversion is required?

I would convert in both if the resource is on Ethernet.

Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com> wrote:Hi,

For dlsw config with only Ethernet, when should I convert the cannonical to
non-cannonical address?

Do I need to convert in

dlsw icanreach max-address

and

dmac-output-list?

Thanks.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/

o!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/

                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:40 GMT-3