From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Mon Jun 14 2004 - 21:25:48 GMT-3
Those are two different things you're working with. FR shaping is a
preventative measure against congestion within the FR switch network. CBWFQ
is a method to resolve congestion when it actually occurs on a router's
egress interface. Does your question ask for a bandwidth guarantee from
end-to-end across two points? Or does it ask for a guarantee for a specific
flow in the midst of congestion?
----- Original Message -----
From: <samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk>
To: "studygroup" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 1:29 PM
Subject: Bandwidth Vs MinCIR for CBWFQ
> Hi Group
>
> When asked to guarantee BW foe QOS using CBWFQ on interfaces encapsulated
> with frame-relay. What is the correct way to do so.
>
> Do I apply Bandwidth statement as I would for a HDLC interafce or even
> ethernet, or do I rely on shapping DLCI with a MIncir equal the BW
required.
>
> TIA
>
> Sam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:40 GMT-3