RE: Traffic Priority

From: Richard Dumoulin (richard.dumoulin@vanco.es)
Date: Sat Jun 12 2004 - 23:27:06 GMT-3

Hi Ty,

I have seen in your acl

access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16383 16384.

Should not it be

access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16383 32767 ?

I think it is in frame-relay where you configure the range instead,

frame ip rtp priority 16384 16383

Please correct me if I'm wrong,

--Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Ty [mailto:tycampbell@comcast.net]
Sent: domingo, 13 de junio de 2004 4:13
To: ccLABs
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Traffic Priority

rsvp is done on the interface with "ip rsvp bandwidth" and you can specify
the parameters that you want after that. This should be applied to all
routers in the path that your voice traffic is taking

CBWFQ is a little more difficult, but here is an example from a lab I was
working on this evening: (irrelevant parts omitted) you may have to change
things, depends on your setup..etc....but this should give you a rough idea

class-map match-all voice
  match access-group 101
!
!
policy-map traffic
  class voice <- matches class-map voice
    priority 128
  class class-default <- all other traffic
   fair-queue
!
int s0
service-policy output traffic
!
access-list 101 permit tcp any eq 1720 any
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1720
access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16383 16384
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccLABs" <ccLABs@wanit.com>
To: "'Ty'" <tycampbell@comcast.net>
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 8:54 PM
Subject: RE: Traffic Priority

> Ty:
>
> What are the commands to implement RSVP or CBWFQ
>
> Thanks In Advance
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---- 

--
> -------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: If You Are Not The Intended Recipient Do Not Access Or Use 
> In Any Way! -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ty
> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 8:11 PM
> To: rexperts; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Traffic Priority
>
> seems like you can use either RSVP or CBWFQ for this then
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "rexperts" <routerexpert@yahoo.com>
> To: "Ty" <tycampbell@comcast.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Traffic Priority
>
>
> > There is a full T1, however, when it gets tight I want the voice to
always
> take priority.
> >
> > Thanks In Advance
> >
> > Ty <tycampbell@comcast.net> wrote:
> > Sounds like CBWFQ to me
> >
> > how much bandwidth do want to allocate to voice, and how much to 
> > data ?
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "rexperts"
> > To:
> > Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 4:22 PM
> > Subject: Traffic Priority
> >
> >
> > > Simple setup
> > >
> > > This T1 line handles Voice and Data traffic.
> > > How do I set up queuing to give priority to voice traffic?
> > >
> > > Interface FastEthernet 0
> > > IP Address 12.12.12.1 255.255.255.248
> > > Speed auto
> > >
> > > Interface Serial 0
> > > IP Unnumbered
> > > Service-module T1 timeslots 1-24
> > >
> > > Thanks In Advance
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Friends.  Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger

**********************************************************************
Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient.  If you are
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in
error and that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with the
content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.co.uk

The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses
which could damage your own computer system. While the sender has taken
every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept
liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses.
You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachments to
this e-mail. 
**********************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:39 GMT-3