From: Karim (karim_ccie@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 10 2004 - 18:27:28 GMT-3
There was no restriction on the network type to be used. I believe your
suggestion will work. Any other opinions ??
Karim.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wang Dehong-DWANG1" <Dehong.Wang@motorola.com>
To: "'Karim'" <karim_ccie@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 12:16 AM
Subject: RE: OSPF over broadcast - drop mulitcast.
> I am thinking about the following:
>
> 1. change the network type on ethernet to non-broadcast, unicast..
> 2. then add neighbour under ospf process.
>
> Does it meet the requirments?
>
> - Dehong
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Karim
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 3:37 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OSPF over broadcast - drop mulitcast.
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Need your help in the following problem:
>
> Having two routers on the same ethernet segment, asked to drop multicast
> traffic betwen the two routers. Meanwhile make sure that adjacecny will
still
> established between the two routers.
>
> I was thinking about a passive interface on both routers but passive
interface
> will drop the adjacency. So would it be solved with passive plus neighbor
> command on both routers ?? Any ideas ??? am I thinking in the right
direction
> ??
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Karim.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:37 GMT-3