From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Thu Jun 10 2004 - 11:46:07 GMT-3
I meant bandwidth. The class should read:
policy-map RESERVE
class A
priority 500
class B
bandwidth 500
class C
bandwidth 1000
Still early ;)
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Torney [mailto:ptorney@satx.rr.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:41 AM
> To: Brian McGahan
> Subject: Re: CBWFQ in the real life
>
> Hi Brian:
>
> Why did you use 'priority xxx' under class B and C and not 'bandwidth
> xxx'?
> Doesn't the way you did this result in all classes sharing the LLQ?
>
> Thanks.
> Pat Torney
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> To: <roih@012.net.il>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:17 AM
> Subject: RE: CBWFQ in the real life
>
>
> > Roi,
> >
> > Configure the voice traffic in the low latency queue (priority
> > statement under the class), and do a bandwidth reservation for
classes B
> > and C. Put this class inside another nested policy that shapes out
to
> > 2Mbps.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > policy-map RESERVE
> > class A
> > priority 500
> > class B
> > priority 500
> > class C
> > priority 1000
> >
> > policy-map SHAPE
> > class class-default
> > shape average 2000000
> > service-policy RESERVE
> >
> >
> > The above configuration gives 500Kbps of low latency to class A,
> > and guarantees at least 500Kbps and 1000Kbps for class B and class C
> > respectively in the case of congestion. The congestion condition is
> > bound by the outer service policy, which is shaping the aggregate of
all
> > classes in RESERVE to 2Mbps. In the case of the absence of traffic
for
> > a particular class, one or more of the other classes may use the
> > bandwidth allocated to the missing class.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > roih@012.net.il
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 5:28 AM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: CBWFQ in the real life
> > >
> > > hi group.
> > >
> > > I need help in CBWFQ case in the real world.
> > > here it goes:
> > >
> > >
> > > 3 classes A,B,C the first is voice.
> > >
> > > I have fast Ethernet interface and I need the limit it to 2M
> > (that's
> > > what
> > > the
> > > customer wants to pay).
> > > in 2M I have the police the traffic the A and B will get
> > > 0.5M each and C the other 1M.
> > > Now for the problem: I want to be able the allocate the BW of
class A
> > if
> > > no
> > > packets of voice are arriving and use it
> > > in class B, the same case from B to C.
> > > So, my config file have to give me the option to use the entire BW
> > even if
> > > A
> > > and B are empty. I've tried it in few ways (also with the new
> > feature
> > > "two-
> > > rate
> > > policer" but no success.
> > > The BW remaining commands cant help here because it define the way
the
> > > Allocate the left BW after the classes used the BW. My challenge
is to
> > > "leak"
> > > BW from class to class and not from the remaining "bank" to the
> > classes
> > >
> > >
> > > Experts, Any idea??
> > >
> > > p.s the version can be 12.3...
> > >
> > > Roi
> > >
> > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:37 GMT-3