DLSW

From: Ahmed Mustafa (ahmed.mustafa@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Fri May 28 2004 - 19:54:02 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie2be: "Re: BGP customers?"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "Re: lab instructions vs ospf default route"
• Next in thread: Chris Larson: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Chris Larson: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mustafa: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Chris Larson: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mustafa: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: DLSW"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

If the requirement is not to allow DLSW to initiate a call should port 2065 be
blocked with port 2067 or just port 2065

• Next message: ccie2be: "Re: BGP customers?"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "Re: lab instructions vs ospf default route"
• Next in thread: Chris Larson: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Chris Larson: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mustafa: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Chris Larson: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mustafa: "Re: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: DLSW"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: DLSW"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:19 GMT-3