Re: question about STP

From: Phil (ccie9323@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri May 28 2004 - 09:12:31 GMT-3


Also, you can have all bridges with the same priority
and change the port cost as you did.

--- Phil <ccie9323@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Tom,
>
> You have to make cat2950#1 the secondary root to
> acomplish this. First, STP checks the bridge
> priority
> and then the port cost as a tie breaker.
>
> Phil
>
> --- Tom Young <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> > Hi, group
> >
> > I confused on the spantree question. I
> connected
> > the
> > network as below, two cat6509s and two cat2950s,
> the
> > cat6509#1 for the STP root and the cat6509#2 for
> the
> > secondary root. The port that connect cat2950#1
> from
> > cat2950#2 was blocked by STP function. I want to
> > block the
> > port that from Cat6509#2 to Cat2950#2. I tried the
> > next
> > two commands, but failured, how can I do ? Help
> > me,please.
> >
> > set spantree portvlancost 3/3 cost 200
> > set spantree portcost 3/3 cost 200
> > (the port 3/3 of cat6509#2 was connected with
> > cat2950#2)
> >
> > cat6509#1------cat6509#2
> > | |
> > | |
> > cat2950#1------cat2950#2
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > http://bb.yahoo.co.jp/
> >
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:18 GMT-3