From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Thu May 27 2004 - 02:08:36 GMT-3
Ken,
Yes there is a difference. In the first configuration non FTP
traffic is not guaranteed bandwidth in the case of congestion. In the
second configuration, non FTP traffic is guaranteed 10% of the output
queue in the case of congestion.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Kenneth Wygand
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 10:04 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: bandwidth-percent in class-default
>
> Is there a difference between the results of the following
configurations?
>
> My requirement is to reserve 90% of the interface bandwidth for FTP
and
> 10% for everything else. Note the explicit "bandwidth-percent"
> configuration command under the "class-default" my policy-map.
>
> <snip>
> OPTION 1:
> class ftp
> match protocol ftp
> policy-map 90forFTP
> class ftp
> bandwidth-percent 90
> interface s0
> max-reserve-bandwidth 90
> service-policy 90forFTP
>
> OPTION 2:
> class ftp
> match protocol ftp
> policy-map 90forFTP
> class ftp
> bandwidth-percent 90
> class class-default
> bandwidth-percent 10
> interface s0
> max-reserve-bandwidth 100
> service-policy 90forFTP
> </snip>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Ken
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:17 GMT-3