RE: ISIS over Frame Relay

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 17:58:05 GMT-3


Regardless of that, it will not work. GRE tunnel is not necessary.
However, going back and recreating your point-to-point sub-interface as a
multipoint subinterface IS necessary.

Both will then show up as the correct type of ISIS interface so everything
matches and is happy.

But Brian is right as well, you will also need to map clns.

Don't forget to choose the DIS appropriately as well!

 
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brian McGahan
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:06 PM
To: Ahmed Mustafa; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ISIS over Frame Relay

Ahmed,

        Yes you still need the 'frame-relay map clns' command. This is used
for protocol resolution of IS-IS on the VC, and is independent of the
network type IS-IS is using.

HTH,

Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Ahmed Mustafa
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 12:52 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: ISIS over Frame Relay
>
> If I am running Frame-Relay between two routers.
>
> R1 is configured with point-to-point
> and R2 is configured with phyiscal interface.
>
>
> r1
> -----
>
> int s0.1 point-to-point
> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay intf-dlci 102
>
> r2
> -------
>
> int s0
> ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.1 201 broadcast.
>
> Now I enable ISIS between those routers:
>
> on r2 (with newer ios)
>
> I could actually configure
> isis network point-to-point
>
> For example,
>
> r2
> ------
> int s0
> ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.1 201 broadcast isis network point-to-point
> frame-relay map clns 201 broadcast---------> Do I still need this
> command, that is my question
>
> If lab doesn't allow to use isis network point-to-point command, then
I
> will
> have no choice, but to run tunneling
>
> For tunneling, please verify my configs.
>
> r1
> -------
> int s0.1 point-to-point
> ip router isis
>
> int tun0
> ip unnumbered int s0.1
> ip router isis
> tunnel source 1.1.1.1
> tunnel destination 1.1.1.2
>
> r2
> --------------
> int s0
> ip router isis
>
> int tun0
> ip unnumbered int s0
> ip router isis
> tunnel source 1.1.1.2
> tunnel destination 1.1.1.1
> tunnel destination 1.1.1.2
>
> Some sources define not to run ip router isis on physical interface
that
> is
> used as an ip unnumbered under the tunnel interfaces. Instead just
run ip
> router isis on tunnel interfaces, and use passive interface command
for
> physical interfaces that is used as an ip unnumbered under isis rouing
> process such as
>
> r1
> -------
> router isis
> passive interface s0.1
>
> r2
>
> ------
>
> router isis
> passive interface s0
>
> Any differences,
>
> Ahmed
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:14 GMT-3