From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed May 19 2004 - 15:35:57 GMT-3
Sorry, I might not be the right guy to do that. However this should get you
started:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos_c/fqcprt4/qcfpoli.htm
Also, the Cisco book "IP Quality of Service" by Vesgesna is a great
reference.
----- Original Message -----
From: "ali" <asayyed@atheer.net.sa>
To: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:58 PM
Subject: RE: wan managent
> My frined
> can u please explain more with sample ..
> And is what I said regarding the WAN link is right or not ..
>
> All what I need is to control each customer in the same time controlling
the
> WAN link depending in customer reservation
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Chang [mailto:changjoe@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 7:36 PM
> To: ali; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: wan managent
>
> I think traffic policing is one way. Multiple policing rules can be
> configured for an interface, one for each traffic (customer) stream, for a
> specific direction (outbound or inbound).
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ali" <asayyed@atheer.net.sa>
> To: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>; "ccielab"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:34 AM
> Subject: RE: wan managent
>
>
> > Dear Sir
> > Ya I can get some if benefit like the following
> > Ae are ISP ok ,, and as u know the customer we request ( as outbound
> > request ) around 170K but his inbound traffic more than 1M even he
> reserved
> > ( buy )from us as 512K ..
> > So if I apply the shaping in the LAN side the WAN link will be flooded (
> in
> > inbound .. I mean from internet to the customer ) by around 1M then in
> the
> > LAN side will shape by 512
> >
> > By doing this I loss 512 from wan link ...... and as u know it cost very
> > high
> >
> > So I need to implement QoS to make sure each customer get just his
> reserved
> > bandwidth even in WAN link
> >
> > For this reason I said in the Core router
> >
> > Ur advice is highly concer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Joe
> > Chang
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:48 PM
> > To: ali; ccielab
> > Subject: Re: wan managent
> >
> > Just curious, why do you want to implement it on the "Core Router"?
> Wouldn't
> > you conserve more resources if you limit traffic on the "POP Router"?
> Would
> > there be any advantages limiting traffic on the LAN interface instead of
> the
> > WAN?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "ali" <asayyed@atheer.net.sa>
> > To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:59 AM
> > Subject: wan managent
> >
> >
> > > Dear All
> > > How I can control the WAN link by using QoS
> > > I mean let us I have the fowling
> > >
> > > Customers ---------------------------------POP Router
> > > (serial )-------WAN Link ------------- (serial )Core
> > > Router------------------------internet
> > >
> > > If I have multi customers in the LAN side of the our POP (one Ethernet
> > > port ) and I want to limit each customer by some certain bandwidth
fomr
> > WAN
> > > Link
> > >
> > > Like customer 1 will consume 64 from wan
> > > And customer 2 will consume 128 from wan
> > > And customer 3 will consume 256 from wan
> > >
> > > And so on
> > >
> > > Taking in consideration the uplink request is not like the down link
> > > because it is internet services
> > >
> > > Is the good way to implant it in outbound traffic in serial core
router?
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:13 GMT-3